(no subject)

[queenisme1.livejournal.com]

Discussion topic: Insane monarchs throughout history!

Comments

[studiesemerald.livejournal.com]

"Are you even allowed to talk about such things?"

[queenisme1.livejournal.com]

Why wouldn't I be?

[studiesemerald.livejournal.com]

"Some royal personages do not take kindly to humans questioning their sanity."

[queenisme1.livejournal.com]

People question my sanity all the time. I suppose it's because things are still in the hands of the regents.

If people don't want to they certainly don't have to mention anyone still alive...

[studiesemerald.livejournal.com]

The trouble is, royalty in Moriarty's world tends to lead very, very long lives.

"Macbeth would count, I suppose, even if Shakespeare's account was rather fabricated."

[glitterunddoom.livejournal.com]

Ludwig II is certainly the best.

[queenisme1.livejournal.com]

Oh? What makes him so great, as insane monarchs go?

[fritz4now.livejournal.com]

Well now there's a cheery topic!

Sane monarchs might be a shorter list.

*grin*

[queenisme1.livejournal.com]

Possibly. But then I couldn't add myself, and what is the fun of a discussion topic without a little egotism.

I am trying to figure out where they went wrong. Some of them it is obvious. Like bathing in blood and giving animals titles but what else should be avoided to protect my reputation as sane?

And before you lecture me on how I am not insane, I am JOKING