Lovers? That implies commitment, mademoiselle. They are only fine bedfellows who, once satisfied, abandon one another. *bitterly* If one thing is certain of the two it is that neither of them can last.
Ahh, you're going down the sneaky road but even though that slaps me square in the chest like a cheetah on vitamins I find it intriguing slash attractive because it does trigger an ongoing conversation. Because this means you're either trying to embarass me or you just found a very good way to dodge the question.
Possibility number one won't work since I never claimed to be omniscient. Also, I do respect people's private thoughts. Also, in that case I would call myself head omniscient, which I do not. (It would look rather stupid as well, wouldn't it. I mean, it just doesn't have the sound of head psychic. The way you swallow the p. Beautiful.)
So. Are you trying to dodge the question or are you just desperate to keep this conversation going?
And to answer your question, maybe I'm just curious. I know it killed the cat but then I have eight more chances, right?
Are you participating in one or the other at the moment, then? And you don't have to "sir" me. Shawn is totally alright. Unless you expect me to madam you. Do you? Because I can do that. I am a very polite young man, you see.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I do like that idea. They seem to have both found a home in me and settled in quite nicely...
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
You will pardon the guess, but you were alone much?
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
You claim, after all, to be psychic, so you should know my thought process.
no subject
Possibility number one won't work since I never claimed to be omniscient. Also, I do respect people's private thoughts. Also, in that case I would call myself head omniscient, which I do not. (It would look rather stupid as well, wouldn't it. I mean, it just doesn't have the sound of head psychic. The way you swallow the p. Beautiful.)
So. Are you trying to dodge the question or are you just desperate to keep this conversation going?
And to answer your question, maybe I'm just curious. I know it killed the cat but then I have eight more chances, right?
no subject
no subject
no subject
You may call me what you like, sir.
no subject
What is your name then?
no subject
My name is Morgan.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
But no. The hate is too strong, and there will be either atonement or punishment. There will be.
no subject
no subject
And now he will not leave my mind.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)