[Jack waggles a pair of fingers at Gina and he offers to her.] Sometimes we're forced to do things out of necessity that aren't exactly viewed as good.
The system wasn't made for real people. I know another game system where in lieu of alignment, you select your character's defining virtue and vice. When in doubt on how your character would act, you can fall back on those core principles of who they are.
But the world doesn't work that way. People can be lawful stupid, and calculating good.
[She doesn't look at him for a moment, shrugging.] I cannot say there is any one path that I've always followed. But I wonder, sometimes--do you see the same Truth in me you did? Am I still...
There is a popular roleplaying game that includes, as part of character creation, ranking your character on a three-by-three matrix as to their level of lawfulness and goodness--lawful, neutral, chaotic and good, neutral, evil. Thus, a character may be lawful evil or neutral good.
But none of those fits me, when it comes down to it.
[Jack waggles a pair of fingers at Gina and he offers to her.] Sometimes we're forced to do things out of necessity that aren't exactly viewed as good.
The system wasn't made for real people. I know another game system where in lieu of alignment, you select your character's defining virtue and vice. When in doubt on how your character would act, you can fall back on those core principles of who they are.
But the world doesn't work that way. People can be lawful stupid, and calculating good.
[She doesn't look at him for a moment, shrugging.] I cannot say there is any one path that I've always followed. But I wonder, sometimes--do you see the same Truth in me you did? Am I still...
There is a popular roleplaying game that includes, as part of character creation, ranking your character on a three-by-three matrix as to their level of lawfulness and goodness--lawful, neutral, chaotic and good, neutral, evil. Thus, a character may be lawful evil or neutral good.
But none of those fits me, when it comes down to it.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
[With him, her tone is gentle, but there's definite warning.]
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...
...
...
...
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
no subject
no subject
But the world doesn't work that way. People can be lawful stupid, and calculating good.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
I shouldn't ask.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Big surprise, eh?
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
But none of those fits me, when it comes down to it.
He's Lawful Neutral according to Fritz's test
Gina's Neutral Good. *snrk*
Heh. Do we even need to test the Doctor? CGx10, probably.
Shall I do Fran?
Could be interesting.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
[With him, her tone is gentle, but there's definite warning.]
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...
...
...
...
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
no subject
no subject
But the world doesn't work that way. People can be lawful stupid, and calculating good.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
I shouldn't ask.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Big surprise, eh?
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
But none of those fits me, when it comes down to it.
He's Lawful Neutral according to Fritz's test
Gina's Neutral Good. *snrk*
Heh. Do we even need to test the Doctor? CGx10, probably.
Shall I do Fran?
Could be interesting.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)