Well, in that respect, I'm going to trust science. After all, it's accurate more often than ancient prophecies or calendars. Why, what do you think is going to happen?
My trust is based more on the fact that this is what we have observed so far. No prophecy has ever turned out to be true, or it has been so vague that it could have predicted anything.
How can you overrate something you need for surviving? Boring or not, there are situations in which it can suddenly become the most wonderful thing ever.
You really don't get it, do you? It's not overrated because it's needed for survival. It's overrated because it's automatic and everyone makes a big deal about it.
no subject
You don't get it. Even if it were noticed. It would be too late. There would be nothing we could do about it anyway.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
[But he's not ruling it out entirely. Stranger things have happened.]
no subject
no subject
Me? I don't care. As I've said, in the grand scheme it doesn't matter.
no subject
Wouldn't you want to know, though?
no subject
[Sherlock is confused.]
no subject
no subject
[Which is to say boring.]
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
[And he's had his breathing threatened.]
no subject
*He too knows what he is talking about.*
no subject
[Sherlock's bored now.]
no subject
no subject
[So, yes.]
no subject
no subject
[Because in his mind, if it's automatic, it can't be exciting.]
no subject
no subject
[Seriously, his expression says it all.]
no subject
Okay. What is exciting, then?
no subject
[He's married to it and it's his drug of choice.]
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Sorry for the TL;DR - this is what he does when he's explaining his deductions
Hah, no, that's fine. In fact, this is brillant. In my mind, I can so hear him saying this! :D
Oh good! The deductions are always the most difficult part XD
I can imagine! Good work, really. My colleagues were wondering why I was grinning at the screen. :D
Again, thank you :)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Because I honestly don't know where else to take this thread.
I was about to say the same. Thanks for the thread! :)